Guide
Been served with an adjudication application? Your response window is short and generally limited to what you already raised in your payment schedule.
An adjudication response must be lodged within a strict, short time limit, and can generally only raise reasons already included in your payment schedule, which makes the original payment schedule critical to your later defence.
Being served with an adjudication application starts a short, strict clock. Unlike a court proceeding, there's generally no ability to seek an extension, and the reasons you can rely on are largely limited to what was already in your payment schedule.
An adjudication response must be lodged within the later of 5 business days after receiving a copy of the application, or 2 business days after receiving notice of the adjudicator's acceptance — and a copy must be served on the claimant at the same time it's lodged. Critically, you're only entitled to lodge a response at all if you provided a payment schedule within the time allowed under section 14(4), or under the section 17(2)(b) second-chance window that follows a claimant's notice of intention to apply for adjudication. This is one of the clearest illustrations of why the payment schedule deadline matters so much earlier in the process.
The restriction only bites on reasons for withholding payment — an adjudication response can still include any other submissions relevant to the response, such as on jurisdiction or valuation methodology. But on reasons for withholding payment specifically, you generally cannot rely on anything that wasn't included in the payment schedule. If your payment schedule was thin on detail on that front, your response is constrained by that, regardless of what stronger arguments might exist.
Within the reasons already raised, a response should marshal the clearest available evidence: contract terms, correspondence, site records and expert input where relevant. The goal is to give the adjudicator a complete, well-supported picture of each reason already on the table.
Respondents on complex projects around the Eastern Suburbs and Parramatta often need to pull together technical or expert evidence quickly within the short response window, which is where preparation time is most valuable. For our broader construction law services in these areas, see Archer Lawyers' Eastern Suburbs and Parramatta pages.
Respondents around Newcastle and the Central Coast are often responding without the benefit of having had legal input on the original payment schedule, which makes reviewing exactly what was and wasn't raised there an essential first step. For our broader construction law services in these areas, see Archer Lawyers' Newcastle and Central Coast pages.
The later of 5 business days after you receive a copy of the application, or 2 business days after you receive notice of the adjudicator's acceptance. Act immediately once you're served.
Generally no, for reasons relating to withholding payment. Other submissions, such as on jurisdiction or valuation methodology, aren't restricted in the same way.
You generally cannot lodge an adjudication response unless you served a payment schedule within the time allowed under section 14(4) — or the later section 17(2)(b) second-chance window — which is why the earlier payment schedule deadline is so important to meet.
Generally no. The timeframes are set by the Act and don't flex for convenience, so getting advice immediately after being served matters.
The adjudicator decides based on the application alone, which places you in a considerably weaker position than if a response had been lodged.
If you've just been served with an adjudication application, time matters. Contact our team for a free assessment.